Guide II · 8 min read

Grading Persian and Iranian coins

Why ancient coins are graded on strike, centring and surface rather than wear alone — and how the adjectival, Sheldon and modern Iranian systems map onto each other.

Key facts

Ancient coin scale
Poor → Fair → Fine → VF → EF → FDC
Modern scale
Sheldon 1–70
Biggest value driver
Strike and centring, not wear
Automatic downgrade
Cleaning, tooling, smoothing

Ancient coins are not graded like modern ones

A modern coin leaves the mint essentially perfect; grading measures how much of that perfection survives. An ancient hammered coin never was perfect. It was struck by hand on a flan that may have been oval, off-centre, cracked or under-weight, using dies that were sometimes worn out before the first strike. Grading Persian coinage therefore assesses two independent things: how well the coin was made, and how well it has survived.

  • Strike — how completely the die transferred to the flan; a weak strike cannot be repaired by time or care.
  • Centring — how much of the design and legend fits on the flan; off-centre Sasanian drachms lose mint signatures and dates.
  • Wear — the only element the traditional adjectival grade truly measures.
  • Surface — corrosion, horn silver, encrustation, scratches, and above all evidence of cleaning or tooling.
  • Toning and eye appeal — subjective, but a cabinet-toned coin consistently outsells a stripped one.

The scales, and how they compare

Adjectival and Sheldon equivalents
AdjectivalAbbrev.SheldonWhat you actually see
Fair / PoorFr / P1–3Type identifiable at best; legends gone
GoodG4–6Outline clear, all detail flat
Very GoodVG8–10Major devices readable, legends partial
FineF12–15Portrait complete but rubbed; most legend readable
Very FineVF20–35Crown ornaments, hair and beard defined
Extremely FineEF / XF40–45Only high-point rub; full legend and mint
About UncirculatedAU50–58Trace friction only
Mint State / FDCMS / FDC60–70As struck, full original surface

Grading modern Iranian coins and notes

Pahlavi gold, Qajar tomans and Islamic Republic rials are machine-struck and so grade conventionally on the Sheldon scale, where the difference between MS62 and MS65 can double the price. Banknotes use their own vocabulary — UNC, AU, XF, VF, F — and are judged on folds, corner rounding, pinholes, staple holes and the crispness of the paper.

  1. 1Hold the note by the edges at a raking angle to reveal folds invisible face-on.
  2. 2Check the corners first; rounding is the earliest sign of circulation.
  3. 3Look through the note against light for pinholes and repaired tears.
  4. 4Original centring and margins matter as much on notes as centring does on coins.

A five-minute grading checklist

  1. 1Weigh the coin and compare it with the published standard for the type.
  2. 2Check centring: is any part of the legend or mint signature off the flan?
  3. 3Assess strike separately from wear — look at the highest and lowest relief areas.
  4. 4Rotate under a raking light at 10× to reveal hairlines from cleaning and tool marks in the fields.
  5. 5Examine the edge for casting seams, file marks, mount removal and test cuts.
  6. 6Only then assign a grade — and write down the reservations alongside it.

Frequently asked questions

Does cleaning a coin lower its grade?

Yes, and often catastrophically. Harsh cleaning strips the original surface and leaves hairline scratches that graders describe as "cleaned" or "surfaces altered" — a penalty that can remove half the value of an otherwise excellent coin.

What does 'FDC' mean on an ancient coin?

Fleur de coin — as it left the dies, with full original lustre or patina and no wear. It is rare for hammered Persian coinage and should always prompt close inspection.

Is a higher grade always worth more?

Not for ancients. A perfectly centred VF Sasanian drachm with a clear mint and date usually sells above an off-centre EF of the same ruler, because the information on the coin is what specialists pay for.